The argument that " other stuff exists" is generally a weak argument, particularly when attempting to push advertising into an article.
#Dungeon keeper 3 similar games series#
Winterheart 14:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC) Incredible that such a game had no article until this year!! - ARC Gritt 13:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC) I have contacted EA (parent company of Bullfrog) by phone and by letter and all I got was a reference to a release schedule for a few months ahead, which obviously did not contain the title, and the line about "Althought the Dungeon Kepper series is an important franchise for there are no plans at this time to commence redevelopment". MardukZero 06:00, 15 October 2005 (UTC) Well, I begun new article about DK2, but I need help. Solution? Write the article for the thing in question and remove it's redirect quality. Then, someone made the mention of DK2 a wikilink (is that the term?), which ends up causing a loop. It's because someone set up Dungeon Keeper 2 to redirect to Dungeon Keeper because of no one having made an article for DK2 yet. Sure, they're part of a series, but they're still different things. That's like having the wiki link for Star Trek II link back to the article for Star Trek: The Motion Picture. Nope, only inspired by DK - TheRaven 19:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC) DK2 Why does the wiki link for Dungeon Keeper 2 redirect back to the Dungeon Keeper article? They're separate games, even if they are part of a series. I'm going to edit the article so that it doesn't immediately disagree with itself after stating something. But I'm pretty sure it's one of those things that is undocumented and can't be proven, it was just widely discussed at the time and has entered unwritten knowledge. Anybody able to provide a more accurate description of events? - Justdig 21:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC) EA pulled it when they started the process of dismantling Bullfrog. I find it hard to believe that they began to produce a game, realised that it wasn't accurately described by its title, and as a result, stopped producing it.
Um, this quote about DK3: "Bullfrog discontinued this idea, as it was above land so therefore no longer "Dungeon" keeper.". Link to avatar is pointless (leads to ultima avatar section, i will remove) However, if we do this then we also have to consider that Populous: The Beginning is based on the Magic Carpet engine which also seems to be the case in several articles on the web (search for Magic Carpet). Should we consider the engine to be the Magic Carpet engine or the Syndicate Wars engine? I would leave it as Magic Carpet engine based on an interview with Molyneux search for Magic Carpet). Needs info on original design of Dungeon Keeper (screenshots have a typical dungeon and skeleton), and cancelled Dungeon Keeper 3.ĭungeon Keeper is actually based on the Syndicate Wars engine, which in turn is based on the Magic Carpet engine.